Amarok vs iTunes
I get asked a lot why I hate iTunes and what's so much better about Amarok. This is about Amarok 1.4.7, since there is no good way to run Amarok 2 yet. When I can get any copy of Amarok 2 to load a track and play it, either via the KDE4 Live CDs or from RangerRick's KDE on OSX native project, I'll give it a spin.
Here's a quick list of beefs with iTunes:
--Currently I have a Party Shuffle running in iTunes in one window, and then a collection window next to it, that's not really ideal
-- Like many things, there are tools for this (Floola I guess)
-- iTunes doesn't really like it when you just take a bunch of folders with MP3s in them and drop it in the folder your collection's in. Well, it doesn't "not like it", it just doesn't notice them. There are tools you can run, which take ages to rescan your entire collection, but the situation is lame. Amarok does that better.
I would put up a similar list of things I think iTunes does better, but I'm not sure what those things are. I don't use ratings, the checkbox thing never seems to work, at least against my iPod, and I don't like the layout of the collection list (finder-like or a huge list of tracks), I prefer a nested list of Artist -> Album -> Track. That makes it way easy to browse, and doesn't make my targets move like the finder interface does.
So you'll notice, there /are/ solutions for many of the features I like in Amarok, but most of them involve "find another app to run to let you do this", whether that's a browser so I can hunt for lyrics or Wikis, or Floola or iScrobbler to deal with other features that iTunes should have by default. I have huge doubts about the Amarok UI redesign in Amarok 2.0 until I actually see it in action, but being native should help its stability on OSX. For now I either just use iTunes, or run Amarok in a VM.
- xrayspx's blog
- Log in to post comments
- 7904 reads